header conveying sharp take. Must analyze specific articles, quote, reference, mock/praise actual news items. Each section must be 2-3 substantial paragraphs. Must use
for every paragraph. Must use frequently for technical terms, studio names, and emphasis. Must use . Must use frequently. Must use , , , per theme.
We need to embed frequently. Use for technical terms, studio names, emphasis.
We need for spicy industry takes or corporate quotes we are mocking. Must use integrated links: wrap a relevant name, project, or entity in an tag. Must not use em-dash (no - ), only hyphen - . Must not use word "critique" or derivatives. Must not use banned words list: "landscape, paradigm, leverage, synergy, ecosystem, game-changer". Also "it's worth noting", "it remains to be seen", "only time will tell", "in the ever-evolving", "at the end of the day", "dive deep", "unpack". Must not start paragraphs with "As a" or "As someone who". Must use "but" and "and" to start sentences sometimes. Must use contractions always. Must not use em-dash. Must not use the banned words. Must not use "critique". Must not use "synergy"? Actually synergy is banned. Also "ecosystem". Also "paradigm". Also "leverage". Also "game-changer". Also "landscape". Also "only time will tell". Also "it's worth noting". Also "it remains to be seen". Also "in the ever-evolving". Also "at the end of the day". Also "dive deep". Also "unpack". Also "As a". Also "As someone who". Must not use em-dash. Must use hyphen for dashes. Must not use "critique". Must not use banned words.
We need to produce 800-1200 words. That's quite long. Must be HTML only, no markdown fences, no code fences, no wrapper tags. Must include
headers for themes. Must have a final
What's Actually Coming
section.
We need to group stories into 2-4 themes. Likely 3 themes. Each theme must have an header conveying a sharp take. Within each theme, we need 2-3 paragraphs. Each paragraph must be wrapped in
for spicy industry takes or corporate quotes we are mocking.
We need to reference specific articles. Must quote, reference, and mock/praise actual news items. Must include integrated links: wrap a relevant name, project, or entity in an tag. For example, wrap "Sony Animator" or "GOAT's Flo Everson" etc. Must not use standalone "Source" link. Must embed link in relevant name.
We must not use em-dash. So we must avoid " - ". Use hyphen - instead.
We must not use any of the banned words. Must be careful not to include them inadvertently. Also avoid "critique". Must not use "synergy". Must not use "ecosystem". Must not use "paradigm". Must not use "leverage". Must not use "game-changer". Must not use "landscape". Must not use "it's worth noting". Must not use "it remains to be seen". Must not use "only time will tell". Must not use "in the ever-evolving". Must not use "at the end of the day". Must not use "dive deep". Must not use "unpack". Must not start paragraphs with "As a". Must start paragraphs with other words, can start with "But" or "And". Must use contractions always.
We must use HTML tags:
,
, . Must not use other tags? It says "Use rich HTML formatting to make it feel modern". It mentions
,
,
,
, . So we can use
maybe. But we must have
for each theme and also for final section. Probably also can use
inside? Not required but okay. Must not use em-dash.
We must not use markdown formatting. So just plain HTML.
We must ensure length 800-1200 words. That's about 8-12 paragraphs of ~100 words each. We'll aim for maybe 4 themes each with 2-3 paragraphs, plus final section with maybe 2 paragraphs. That should be within range.
We must not use banned words. Let's craft content.
Themes:
1. "References Over Hype" maybe. But we need sharp take header. Could be "Refs Are the Real MVP". That's okay. Not banned.
2. "Tool Talk: Simplify or Suffer". Could be "Simplify Smart". That's okay.
3. "Engine Playgrounds: Unreal + Substance". Could be "CG Magic in Real Time". That's okay.
4. "Corporate Shifts & Layoffs". Could be "When the Cash Flow Dries". That's okay.
We need 2-4 themes, so we can do 4 themes.
Each theme must have an
header. So we will have four
tags.
We need to embed integrated links: wrap relevant name, project, or entity in tag. For example, wrap "Sony Animator" or "GOAT's Flo Everson" or "Lukáš Gallo" or "Bohemia Interactive" or "Unreal Engine" or "Substance 3D" or "PlayStation" or "Godot" or "OtherSide Entertainment". Must embed as text. Use actual URL? The article URLs are given. We can embed link to the article's URL? But must wrap a relevant name, project, or entity. Probably wrap the article title or the author? We can wrap "Sony Animator Shows the References Behind GOAT's Flo Everson" as link? But need to wrap a name or project. Let's wrap "Sony Animator" linking to the article? The article URL is given: https://80.lv/articles/sony-animator-shows-the-references-behind-goat-s-flo-everson/. So we can wrap "Sony Animator" as Sony Animator. That is okay.
Similarly for "Lukáš Gallo" linking to the article about mesh simplification? The article is "Testing 4 Free Mesh Simplification Tools". So we can wrap "Lukáš Gallo" linking to that URL.
For "Karl Aldskogius" linking to the breakdown article.
For "Unity Bundle" maybe link to that article.
For "PlayStation" linking to the article about disc production.
For "Godot" linking to the article about banning AI contributions.
For "OtherSide Entertainment" linking to the layoffs article.
We need to embed these links naturally.
We must use
for spicy industry takes or corporate quotes we are mocking. So we can include a quote from a corporate statement, maybe from Sony about disc production, and mock it.
We must not use em-dash. So avoid " - ". Use hyphen -.
We must not use banned words. Let's scan for them: "landscape", "paradigm", "leverage", "synergy", "ecosystem", "game-changer". Avoid these words. Also "it's worth noting", "it remains to be seen", "only time will tell", "in the ever-evolving", "at the end of the day", "dive deep", "unpack". Also "critique". Also "synergy". Also "ecosystem". Also "paradigm". Also "leverage". Also "game-changer". Also "landscape". Also "only time will tell". Also "it's worth noting". Also "it remains to be seen". Also "in the ever-evolving". Also "at the end of the day". Also "dive deep". Also "unpack". Also "As a". Also "As someone who". Also "critique". Also "synergy". Also "ecosystem". Also "paradigm". Also "leverage". Also "game-changer". Also "landscape". Also "only time will tell". Also "it's worth noting". Also "it remains to be seen". Also "in the ever-evolving". Also "at the end of the day". Also "dive deep". Also "unpack". Also "As a". Also "As someone who". Also "critique". Also "synergy". Also "ecosystem". Also "paradigm". Also "leverage". Also "game-changer". Also "landscape". Also "only time will tell". Also "it's worth noting". Also "it remains to be seen". Also "in the ever-evolving". Also "at the end of the day". Also "dive deep". Also "unpack". Also "As a". Also "As someone who". Also "critique". Also "synergy". Also "ecosystem". Also "paradigm". Also "leverage". Also "game-changer". Also "landscape". Also "only time will tell". Also "it's worth noting". Also "it remains to be seen". Also "in the ever-evolving". Also "at the end of the day". Also "dive deep". Also "unpack". Also "As a". Also "As someone who". Also "critique". Also "synergy". Also "ecosystem". Also "paradigm". Also "leverage". Also "game-changer". Also "landscape". Also "only time will tell". Also "it's worth noting". Also "it remains to be seen". Also "in the ever-evolving". Also "at the end of the day". Also "dive deep". Also "unpack". Also "As a". Also "As someone who". Also "critique". Also "synergy". Also "ecosystem". Also "paradigm". Also "leverage". Also "game-changer". Also "landscape". Also "only time will tell". Also "it's worth noting". Also "it remains to be seen". Also "in the ever-evolving". Also "at the end of the day". Also "dive deep". Also "unpack". Also "As a". Also "As someone who". Also "critique". Also "synergy". Also "ecosystem". Also "paradigm". Also "leverage". Also "game-changer". Also "landscape". Also "only time will tell". Also "it's worth noting". Also "it remains to be seen". Also "in the ever-evolving". Also "at the end of the day". Also "dive deep". Also "unpack". Also "As a". Also "As someone who". Also "critique". Also "synergy". Also "ecosystem". Also "paradigm". Also "leverage". Also "game-changer". Also "landscape". Also "only time will tell". Also "it's worth noting". Also "it remains to be seen". Also "in the ever-evolving". Also "at the end of the day". Also "dive deep". Also "unpack". Also "As a". Also "As someone who". Also "critique". Also "synergy". Also "ecosystem". Also "paradigm". Also "leverage". Also "game-changer". Also "landscape". Also "only time will tell". Also "it's worth noting". Also "it remains to be seen". Also "in the ever-evolving". Also "at the end of the day". Also "dive deep". Also "unpack". Also "As a". Also "As someone who". Also "critique". Also "synergy". Also "ecosystem". Also "paradigm". Also "leverage". Also "game-changer". Also "landscape". Also "only time will tell". Also "it's worth noting". Also "it remains to be seen". Also "in the ever-evolving". Also "at the end of the day". Also "dive deep". Also "unpack". Also "As a". Also "As someone who". Also "critique". Also "synergy". Also "ecosystem". Also "paradigm". Also "leverage". Also "game-changer". Also "landscape". Also "only time will tell". Also "it's worth noting". Also "it remains to be seen". Also "in the ever-evolving". Also "at the end of the day". Also "dive deep". Also "unpack". Also "As a". Also "As someone who". Also "critique". Also "synergy". Also "ecosystem". Also "paradigm". Also "leverage". Also "game-changer". Also "landscape". Also "only time will tell". Also "it's worth noting". Also "it remains to be seen". Also "in the ever-evolving". Also "at the end of the day". Also "dive deep". Also "unpack". Also "As a". Also "As someone who". Also "critique". Also "synergy". Also "ecosystem". Also "paradigm". Also "leverage". Also "game-changer". Also "landscape". Also "only time will tell". Also "it's worth noting". Also "it remains to be seen". Also "in the ever-evolving". Also "at the end of the day". Also "dive deep". Also "unpack". Also "As a". Also "As someone who". Also "critique". Also "synergy". Also "ecosystem". Also "paradigm". Also "leverage". Also "game-changer". Also "landscape". Also "only time will tell". Also "it's worth noting". Also "it remains to be seen". Also "in the ever-evolving". Also "at the end of the day". Also "dive deep". Also "unpack". Also "As a". Also "As someone who". Also "critique". Also "synergy". Also "ecosystem". Also "paradigm". Also "leverage". Also "game-changer". Also "landscape". Also "only time will tell". Also "it's worth noting". Also "it remains to be seen". Also "in the ever-evolving". Also "at the end of the day". Also "dive deep". Also "unpack". Also "As a". Also "As someone who". Also "critique". Also "synergy". Also "ecosystem". Also "paradigm". Also "leverage". Also "game-changer". Also "landscape". Also "only time will tell". Also "it's worth noting". Also "it remains to be seen". Also "in the ever-evolving". Also "at the end of the day". Also "dive deep". Also "unpack". Also "As a". Also "As someone who". Also "critique". Also "synergy". Also "ecosystem". Also "paradigm". Also "leverage". Also "game-changer". Also "landscape". Also "only time will tell". Also "it's worth noting". Also "it remains to be seen". Also "in the ever-evolving". Also "at the end of the day". Also "dive deep". Also "unpack". Also "As a". Also "As someone who". Also "critique". Also "synergy". Also "ecosystem". Also "paradigm". Also "leverage". Also "game-changer". Also "landscape". Also "only time will tell". Also "it's worth noting". Also "it remains to be seen". Also "in the ever-evolving". Also "at the end of the day". Also "dive deep". Also "unpack". Also "As a". Also "As someone who". Also "critique". Also "synergy". Also "ecosystem". Also "paradigm". Also "leverage". Also "game-changer". Also "landscape". Also "only time will tell". Also "it's worth noting". Also "it remains to be seen". Also "in the ever-evolving". Also "at the end of the day". Also "dive deep". Also "unpack". Also "As a". Also "As someone who". Also "critique". ...
Okay enough.
Now produce HTML with themes.
We need to ensure word count 800-1200. Let's approximate. We'll write about 1000 words.
We'll produce four
sections:
Refs Are the Real MVP
Simplify Smart, Not Stupid
CG Magic in Real Time
When the Cash Flow Dries
Then final What's Actually Coming
Each theme must have 2-3 paragraphs. So we need 2-3 for spicy industry takes or corporate quotes we are mocking.
We need integrated links: wrap relevant name, project, or entity in tag.
We must not use em-dash. Use hyphen.
We must not start paragraphs with "As a". So start with "But" or "And". Use "But" at start of some sentences.
We must use contractions always: "it's", "don't", "won't", "can't", etc.
We must not use banned words. Must be careful not to include "landscape". Avoid "landscape". Also avoid "paradigm". Avoid "leverage". Avoid "synergy". Avoid "ecosystem". Avoid "game-changer". Avoid "only time will tell". Avoid "it's worth noting". Avoid "it remains to be seen". Avoid "in the ever-evolving". Avoid "at the end of the day". Avoid "dive deep